“Care in the Community – Then and Now”. A guest post by John Lowrie

Standard

As part of my in-depth look at development issues in Cambodia, this piece is a guest post from John Lowrie. John heads up three development organisations in Cambodia and is the former Cambodia Country Representative for Ockenden International, and a former Senior Advisor for the Cambodian Institute of Human Rights, and has over 25 years of experience in international development. He is presently based in Cambodia.

socialWORKImage: https://www.marshall.edu/cohp/index.php/departments/social-work/

“If I am working-class and I have a problem, I get a Social Worker.  If I am middle-class, I become a Social Worker!”

So read some graffiti I spotted back in 1980.  I was the Chief Personnel (these days termed “Human Resources”) advisor to Dorset County Social Services.  I told the Director about it and we shared a good laugh as with all good humour, there was more than a hint of truth in it.  Our Director was in fact one of the UK’s leaders in social work and related fields of mental and physical health.  He was one of the first proponents of “Care in the Community”. The idea was to switch children, disabled people, and the elderly from institutional care to return to live at home and with families.  If necessary support would be provided; arrangements for adoption/fostering explored, and where residential care was best, then it should try to resemble normal home-living as much as possible.

A Cambodian foster mother (front, left) who took in a large number of children from the community. In Cambodia, 79% of orphaned and vulnerable children are cared for by older people. For more info, see: http://www.helpage.org/tags/cambodia/

Image: John Lowrie

The graffiti-writer conveyed one essential truth.  Social workers help to solve problems.  This they did then and still do today with success and appreciation, despite inevitable failures, because of dedication and good training.  One simple principle guides them: “the best interests of the client” comes first.  The same is usually true of associated professionals – doctors, nurses, and lawyers that specialize in social work and care.

I had cause to re-visit my early years some 21 years later, by which time I had ventured in to aid and development and served in four countries before taking up a human rights brief in Cambodia in 1998.  That job and my NGO came to an abrupt end in 2002 following an eight page Christmas letter sent by our Finance Officer to donors detailing systematic financial irregularities.  I was lucky in that then, as now, there is always work for people like me with fund-raising skills.  One such consultancy led me to take on a voluntary assignment to review Cambodia’s Disability Action Council (DAC), modeled on the UK body of the same name.  I was back to my origins.

Cambodia by 2002 was well in to its post-conflict transition.  It was in the process of nation-building or re-building.  Considerable efforts and a lot of international aid money were going in to every area of public service…except for one.  I made recommendations, and also set them out in an article that was widely-circulated.  Here is an extract:

Post-conflict developing countries usually attract considerable support to rebuild poor infrastructure and human resource capacities.  Very large sums are spent on roads and buildings that are visible physical evidence of progress being made from philanthropic awards.  Less visible, but still discernible over time, are the efforts to improve services – administrators, lawyers, teachers, health-workers and others all feature prominently in education and training programmes.  Many are supported to go overseas for best education and training.  In Cambodia this process has been going on since 1993 when it was admitted back in to the international community.  There is though one profession that hardly features – social workers.  Why? 

Given the scale of disaster in Cambodia – the world acknowledges the tragedy of the Khmer Rouge with millions killed through execution, starvation, or hard labour and almost every surviving family traumatised – if ever there is a country that needs the best most highly-skilled social or community workers, surely it is this one?  Some 9.8% of the population suffers from one form or more of physical, sensory or psycho-social disability[1].  And the absence of social workers shows, because the weak and vulnerable continue to miss out and be left behind.  There is no institutionalised profession dedicated purely to working with them on a generic or holistic basis to overcome adversity.  Why does social work professional capacity-building seldom appear in international aid programs? 

Cows end poverty.Image: John Lowrie

Unlike the medical, nursing, teaching, and legal professions, there is no national plan.  There is no career entry scheme within services or academic institutions.  The Ministry of Social Affairs does have officials down to district level but their main role is to compile statistics.  It does not have social workers.  In fact they just do not exist although other occupations do perform social work as a sideline.  Mainly it is a responsibility of the Commune Councils and Village Chiefs.  However, their order of priorities is first loyalty to the ruling party, which has 98% of Commune Chiefs, followed by Law and Order.  Social work in reality is part of “Order”.  Given the emphasis on the military and police even today – they receive a much higher share of the national budget than education, health or social services – it means that suppression rather than settlement of problems usually occurs”.

kh-material-zur-sensibilisierung-gegen-gewalt-gegen-frauenImage: http://www.giz.de/en/worldwide/17345.html

What was said in 2002 is still true in 2014, apart from two worthy efforts by the Royal University of Phnom Penh and National Institute of Social Affairs that are only now producing the first graduates.  They are of course mainly at the start of their careers. [2]

Those 12 intervening years have seen Cambodia’s social services blighted by scandals.  The US and other countries placed a ban on international adoptions [3].  Widespread malfeasance was found in the administration of pensions to veterans[4].  Illegal and cruel treatment persists at Social Affairs Detention Centres, especially after vulnerable homeless people or street-workers are rounded up to “beautify” Phnom Penh for international events[5].  Currently topical is the inappropriate vast growth of orphanages and “voluntourism” for private gain and exploitation of children, with the Ministry’s passivity.[6]

cambodia-borei-keila-drug-center-jan-2012-1000Image: http://english.rfa.org/english/news/cambodia/drugs-12092013183433.html

Equally true of this period is that the sector has enjoyed unbroken consistent high funding from Australia, the UK, USA and a host of other countries and well-meaning foundations.  Yet none of them have made serious efforts to establish a statutory social work system and profession.  I do not understand how we could have in such donor countries world-leading social work service providers and academic institutions that could and should be commissioned to install proper systems and ethical standards in Cambodia.  I do not understand how international NGOs with their expatriate leaders are allowed to persist with, and are well-rewarded for providing what are inevitably instead sub-standard and non-sustainable solutions.

Until we do “Care in the Community”, the “Best Interests of the Child” will not penetrate the psyche of public service in Cambodia.

Note: For a case study that illustrates the many ways in which proper social work support and continuity of care for the family would be helpfully, click here

Note: Social Services Cambodia and First Step Cambodia are two NGOs providing quality social work training in Cambodia.

Children from a displaced family, resettled.

Image: John Lowrie


[1] A figure based on research for ADB and World Vision.  More recent research on psycho-social health including trauma passed on to younger generations in Cambodia can be seen on: http://www.tpocambodia.org

[2] Partnerships with the Universities of Washington and Ewha respectively – please see: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/19/world/asia/19iht-educside17.html?pagewanted=1&_r=3&smid=fb-share&

Orphanages and tourism

Standard

An article in the Guardian by Helen Davidson triggered this post. Entitled ‘Cambodia: child protection workers call for end to ‘orphanage tourism’’ , the article featured stories of the exploitation of children in orphanages, the siphoning of donations, and the fact that the majority of children are not orphans. Articles like this tend to give me some hope that things are changing, then in the second paragraph I read that the number of orphanages in Cambodia has increased 75% in the five years from 2006 – 2011. Seventy-five percent. Unsurprising, but completely outrageous.

This is an issue close to my heart. I spent the better part of five years in Cambodia from 2004 – 2010, and during that time I witnessed many cases of orphanages exploiting children, abusing children and allowing foreigners unsupervised access to children. I’ve seen convoys of well intentioned but ill-informed tourists turning up at orphanages in tuk-tuks piled high with toys and food. I’ve seen thousands of dollars dropped into donation boxes, only to be pocketed by the orphanage director. I’ve seen tourists purchase bedding for an entire orphanage, only for it to disappear the following week. Worse than any of this, i’m aware of many cases of orphanage directors, and foreigners sexually abusing children in orphanages.

homepage_main_banner1Image: http://www.orphanages.no

The vast majority of tourists visiting orphanages undoubtedly have good intentions. When we travel, especially to developing countries, we often feel the need to ‘give something back’. Often, this giving involves visiting an orphanage, donating time / money / goods and having some photos taken with some cute kids. I’m guilty of this myself. I’ve visited orphanages in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and Thailand and have the photos to prove it.

I felt this urge to ‘give back’ strongly enough while first visiting Cambodia back in 2004 to set up my own non-profit. However, this need to give something back has turned into an industry that is not benefiting children. Not far into my time in Cambodia, I began to ask myself why it was okay for a succession of tourists to visit orphanages daily, or to turn up and volunteer for a week or two, then disappear. In Australia it would be completely inappropriate for tourists to arrive unannounced at a child care centre, kindergarten, or school and drop off money / toys / food, cuddle the children, take photos and leave. It’s difficult to make a strong comparison, given there are no orphanages in Australia, for very good reasons.

Institutionalising children has been proven to be damaging to their health and wellbeing (see here), while the cost of institutionalising a child far outweighs the cost of supporting that child in community based care (see here). The issues surrounding institutionalised care versus community-based care are complex, and too complicated to go into here, but I keep coming back to the same question: We don’t do it home, so why is it okay when we are visiting developing countries?

We know that the majority of tourists visiting orphanages have good intentions, and that given the correct information would be unlikely to contribute to and participate in an industry that is exploitative and harmful to children. However, without access to this information, tourist behaviour will be slow to change. The simple fact is: children are NOT tourist attractions.

mainpic

Image: http://www.thinkchildsafe.org

Campaigns like www.orphanages.no and www.thinkchildsafe.org go a long way in addressing the issue once tourists arrive in Cambodia. However, without pre-departure education in the country of origin, many tourists arrive with the intention of volunteering at, or visiting an orphanage with no knowledge of the consequences of their participation in the orphanage industry. It’s my dream to see an organisation here in Australia delivering educational workshops to school leavers on voluntourism, and the consequences of orphanage tourism. While there are great resources online (www.learningservice.info) to educate those interested in voluntourism, face to face workshops in schools would spread the word further.

If tourists are educated, they will stop supporting orphanages, and the orphanage industry will slowly die off. Children in need of care will be placed in community-based care with the appropriate support from social workers. All this is a long way off, but hopefully we are well on the way.

For more information about voluntourism and orphanages, please see the following links:

Voluntourismhttp://www.learningservice.info

Orphanageshttp://www.orphanages.no, http://www.thinkchildsafe.org, http://www.thinkchildsafe.org/en/content/tip4/qna.html

Articles

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/10/25/orphanage-tourism_n_4162222.html

http://www.whydev.org/where-are-the-children-orphanage-voluntourism-in-ghana/

http://www.forbes.com/sites/morganhartley/2013/05/24/cambodias-booming-new-industry-orphanage-tourism/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22294205